PMP·PROCESS · Process Domain·UnitPROCESS · Unit 01Access: Premium
Project Initiation and Planning
Prepare for Project Initiation and Planning with PMP practice questions covering 10 topics. Part of Process Domain — build your knowledge and track your progress with Got PMP.
What’s in it.
10 topics- Topic 01
Project Charter and Business Case
15 questions - Topic 02
Scope Management and WBS
15 questions - Topic 03
Requirements Elicitation and Traceability
15 questions - Topic 04
Schedule Development and Critical Path Method
15 questions - Topic 05
Cost Estimation and Budgeting
15 questions - Topic 06
Resource Planning and Acquisition
16 questions - Topic 07
Communications Management Planning
16 questions - Topic 08
Procurement Planning and Solicitation
15 questions - Topic 09
Stakeholder Management Planning
15 questions - Topic 10
Integration Management and the Project Management Plan
15 questions
Sample questions
3 of manyA few questions from this unit, with the answer and a full explanation. The complete bank is available when you start practising.
A PM's project is entering a new phase with significantly different stakeholder involvement. Several stakeholders who were peripheral in Phase 1 are now critical decision-makers. The Communications Management Plan was approved at the start of Phase 1 and has not been updated. What risks does this create and what should the PM do?
- The outdated plan creates risks including: critical stakeholders not receiving appropriate information, communication methods unsuited to new stakeholder needs, and escalation paths no longer reflecting current decision-making authority. The PM must update the plan to reflect the new stakeholder landscape before Phase 2 beginsCorrect answer
- No risk is created because the Communications Management Plan is a planning document that does not need revision once approved
- The risk is minimal because informal communication will naturally adapt to the new stakeholders without formal plan updates
- The risk is that Phase 2 stakeholders will be over-communicated; the PM should reduce the frequency of updates to avoid information overload
ExplanationThe Communications Management Plan is a living document that must be updated when the project context changes significantly — including phase changes that alter the stakeholder landscape. An outdated plan creates multiple risks: key decision-makers may not receive timely information, communication methods may be inappropriate for new stakeholders' preferences and roles, and escalation paths may not reflect the current decision-making hierarchy. Best practice is to review and update the communications plan at each phase gate, when significant stakeholder changes occur, or when the plan's effectiveness is questioned during performance reviews.
An agile PM is planning communications for a project that includes both an internal development team (agile) and an external regulatory body (requiring formal written submissions). How should the Communications Management Plan address these fundamentally different communication requirements?
- Apply formal written communications to all stakeholders, including the internal team, to ensure consistency and audit trails
- Apply the agile communication approach uniformly to all stakeholders, including the regulator, to simplify the plan
- Create separate plans for internal and external communications and manage them completely independently without cross-reference
- The plan should document separate communication approaches for each stakeholder group: lightweight, real-time mechanisms (standups, information radiators, sprint reviews) for the internal team, and formal, documented, compliant submissions for the regulator, with clear protocols to ensure regulatory communications are accurate and timelyCorrect answer
ExplanationEffective communications planning in a hybrid or agile environment must be tailored to the needs and requirements of different stakeholder groups. Internal agile teams benefit from lightweight, high-frequency, visible communication mechanisms. External regulators typically require formal, documented, compliant written submissions on a defined schedule. A single approach applied to both groups will either over-burden the team (if formal) or alienate the regulator (if informal). The Communications Management Plan must document both approaches, define the responsible parties, and ensure they are integrated into the project calendar. This is an example of tailoring communications to context.
A key stakeholder is classified as 'Resistant' in the stakeholder engagement assessment matrix. What is the PM's most appropriate first action?
- Engage the stakeholder directly in a one-on-one conversation to understand the source of their resistance before developing an engagement strategyCorrect answer
- Report the resistance to the PMO and request guidance on handling difficult stakeholders
- Exclude the stakeholder from project communications to prevent their resistance from influencing others
- Escalate the resistance to the project sponsor immediately and request their intervention
ExplanationWhen a stakeholder is resistant, the PM's first priority is to understand why. Resistance typically has an identifiable cause: concern about personal impact, loss of influence, technical disagreement, or lack of information. Engaging directly — through a one-on-one meeting — demonstrates respect, builds relationship, and often reveals concerns that can be addressed. Escalating to the sponsor before attempting direct engagement is premature. Excluding the stakeholder creates a formal adversary. Documenting without engaging misses the opportunity to resolve the root cause.